He said he's getting us out. Some of the money saved is paying for his education plan.
But what exactly does "getting out" or "ending the war" mean and how much money are we actually talking about saving.
Here's a bigger question. If all of the candidates have economic plans, why doesn't one of them sit down with an economist or two (or twenty) and do an assessment of the costs of their plans and where the money would come from to pay for those plans. It seems simple enough to me and if it is defensible then they should not have a problem with disclosure. The benefit is that candidate could then beat the other ones over the head with the fact that they are the only one that has a true plan for one of the most important issues facing us (IMO the most important).
I have serious problems with a plan without dollar amounts and implementation strategies being called an economic plan. That's not a plan. To me it is an idea, a Christmas wish, but not a plan. The downside could be that your plan just doesn't work, but since I am a voter I want to know that too.