Good time to revisit this out of my own curiosity. These are as of 10/4/24. All info from costar.
Madison at Owl's Head - 300 units - 88% vacant - asking $1.95 per foot. 0% concessions (I know this is wrong)
Riverwalk - 312 units - 36.7% vacant - asking $1.52 per foot. 4.1% concessions (probably a mix of new concessions and burn offs)
Hammock Bay - 400 units - 36.3% vacant - asking $1.83 per foot. 1% concessions.
Dune Lake - 280 units - 11% vacant - asking $1.95 per foot. 1% concessions.
Sanctuary 331 - 264 units - 11% vacant - asking $1.78 per foot. 1% concessions
Terra Mar - 310 units - 6.8% vacant - asking $1.70 per foot. 0.8% concessions.
NEW
The Beacon (by SWHS) - 260 units - 99.6% vacant - asking $2.02 per foot. 16.7% concessions (about 2 months free)
In Freeport, of these 3 multis with 1012 units, we went from 616 empty (61% vacant) to 524 empty (52% vacant) from July to October. Rents slightly down but about constant. Not terrible considering the off-season. Still a ton of units to absorb with many more under construction.
Of the first 3 in south Walton, of these 3 multis with 854 units, we went from 53 empty (6.2% vacant) to 81 empty (9.5% vacant) from July to October. Rents however dropped from averaging around $1.91/ft to around $1.81/ft.
So south of the bay, rents are down and vacancy is up. North of the bay is about holding steady with tenants bouncing around. Really interested to see how the new construction impacts the market. The one behind SWHS (The Beacon) is just starting to lease 260 units. Really interested to see how the one on Moll by St Rita (Saltaire - 256 units) delivers and continues to push down rents in the area. If anyone wants me to add a development to the list let me know - there are a few that I haven't tracked but can start.
Revisiting the slow moving train wreck of area multifamily economics in the area. CoStar was hit with a collusion lawsuit last year so the quality of data isn't as great as it was a year ago but this gives you an idea of where things seem to be now. Showing market (guessing Freeport/South Walton and probably PCB) vacancy at 21.9%.
Number of units is above so I'll just update the asking rents and vacancy. Concessions aren't accurate on costar so not bothering with that.
Owl's Head - asking $1.95 per foot - 80.3% vacant
Riverwalk - asking $1.51 - 26.4% vacant
Hammock Bay - asking $1.85 - 25% vacant
Dune Lakes - asking $1.98 - 11.4% vacant
Sanctuary at 331 - asking $1.98 - 7.6% vacant
Terra Mar - asking $1.87 - 7.4% vacant
Beacon by SWHS - asking $2.01 - 93.9% vacant
New to the party is Saltaire - 256 units still under construction, asking $2.33 for prelease I guess.
Also under construction is multi next to the Freeport Publix, looks like 2 separate projects on the west side of 331 in Freeport, one hidden on the north side of 98 near the new neighborhood Walmart, one east of Saltaire and several others that I'm not thinking of.
Bold prediction is in about 18 months rents south of the bay settle in around $1.50 per foot and north of the bay around $1.20 per foot with blended vacancy around 10%. Many will go back to the lenders.
BIG assumptions here but just throwing out there to show what that means if I'm right. For the Beacon, they probably underwrote rents at $2.25 per foot with 5% vacancy and 2% loss to lease (basically concessions and bad debt). Costar shows 254,741 rentable SF. That's about $6,396k in annual revenue. Assume a 35% expense ratio that's net operating income of $4,157k. They probably assumed a 5% cap rate so a value of $83 million. Now assume $1.50 per foot, 10% vacancy and 2% loss to lease. That takes NOI down to $2,623k. We'll say cap rates are now at 6% (generous) given higher interest rates and your value is now about $43 million. Again big assumptions but that's how investors are looking at this, back of the envelope. Actually discounting more than that but I'm trying to be fair.
Now we'll do Owl's Head. 401,680 SF. I'll assume they underwrote rents at $2 per foot, same vacancy, loss to lease and expense ratio assumptions. $3,138k NOI - 5 cap is about $63 million. They have debt of $53.8 million so their going in value assumptions had to be AT LEAST $75 million. New math - same assumptions in 18 months as above ($1.20/ft - 10% vacancy, 6 cap) - new NOI of $1,781k, value of about $29.7 million.
The reason so many of these were built (besides the ease of permitting them here) is because interest rates were artificially low for so long. That ship has sailed and as the construction loans mature, not only are they getting killed with lower revenue, their debt service has gone way up with reset interest rates. They'll never hit their debt service payments much less their covenants (probably 1.25x what is needed to service the debt) and so deal after deal after deal after deal will be going back to the lenders.
So to the original post, Glidewell's utter nonsense "
having government make land available to developers at a lower or no cost..It’s basic economics – supply and demand... right now, we’ve got no supply and high demand. That’s going to create cost increases and that’s just the laws of economics" is comical. It's going to be a lot more ridiculous as more and more supply keeps coming online.