That's a good point, we should be more concerned about the causeways that haven't yet gone belly under than worrying about how quickly Redfish is repaired. Denial isn't a river, it's more like a landslide.
Last edited:
The place I'm talking about has a culvert running diagonally, not near a lake, just a drainage creek. 30-A already has three patches in this spot, as if it has partially collapsed a little bit already. I'm calling the Three Stooges, er, I mean, the road department on Monday.
Isn't this how Rome collapsed? First the hordes came in on golf carts and then the roads collapsed.
I didn't like that it was used to make an "ageist" comment.It is simply amazing that so many supposedly educated people so misunderstood what I was saying in post #54.
Let's be clear about what we are talking about. Andy seemed to suggest "just filling it in" and be done with it. Which leads to the question, how long will that last? Leader suggested that, possibly due to Bob's suggestion that overdevelopement (Redfish Village, Etc.) caused this problem, a bridge might be a better solution than a causeway. Methinks that the DEP would want to evaluate that, but probably be all for it, rather than more causeway, and signoff on it would come soon.
Now, why FEMA is involved, I don't know, but it seems to be the American way to look for hand-outs from the Federal Government, even from our Republican county government. Go figure. And since FEMA has been asked to be involved, then, of course, Department of Home Security is involved because George Bush placed FEMA under the control Of Homeland Security. Now, please tell me what does this have to do with Obama. Our County, rather than have a guy drive around in a pickup truck and look for possible culvert blockage, would rather just have our roads crumble and ask the federal government to rebuild them.
Our county should just build a small bridge there. Period.