The “don’t build more housing because it’s unaffordable” argument doesn’t make sense to me. Building more always solves the supply/demand and affordability problem. The reason is simple, someone needs to buy it. It serves no one to have tons of vacant, brand new, completed homes just sitting at a price point where no one wants them. Watch what happens on that 331 corridor over the next 2-3 years.
North of 98 is mainly St Joe and that stuff would be short term rental restricted. It seems their playbook though it to be scarce with the residential development to keep prices high. If that land was taken via eminent domain and auctioned off to developers with the condition that it’s built up within 5-10 years your “housing problem” would go poof. It’s what’s ironic with all the “St Joe sucks they’re developing too much” rhetoric. The problem, just look at the land map, is actually the opposite.